United States v. Daley

378 F. Supp. 3d 539 (2019)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Daley

United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia
378 F. Supp. 3d 539 (2019)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Benjamin Daley, Michael Miselis, and Thomas Gillen (defendants) were members of a white-supremacist organization known as the Rise Above Movement (RAM). Between March and August 2017, RAM members organized multiple demonstrations in California and in Charlottesville, Virginia, where they committed violent acts against other people. Daley, Miselis, and Gillen were charged with conspiring to riot and with rioting in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2101, the Federal Anti-Riot Act. Section 2101 defined a riot as a public disturbance involving acts or threats of violence committed by one or more people who were part of a group of three or more people. Daley, Miselis, and Gillen opposed the conspiracy charges, arguing that Wharton’s Rule prohibited the government from charging a defendant with conspiring to riot, because the underlying offense—rioting—required multiple people.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Moon, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership