United States v. DeLaurentis

230 F.3d 659 (2000)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. DeLaurentis

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
230 F.3d 659 (2000)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

James DeLaurentis (defendant) was the supervisor of detectives for a town police department. One of his duties was to assist the state division of alcoholic-beverage control in enforcing state liquor laws. The police department used federal funds to pay the salary of an additional police officer to patrol the streets. Police officers, including the additional officer, were frequently sent to a particular bar in town to stop fighting, public lewdness, drug sales, underage drinking, disorderly conduct, and public drunkenness. DeLaurentis accepted a bribe to use his influence to convince the town council to renew the bar’s liquor license and was indicted for violating the federal-program-fraud statute, among other charges. DeLaurentis moved to dismiss the federal-program-fraud counts before trial. The district court granted the motion because the government (plaintiff) was unable to show a nexus between the alleged bribes and any federal interest or program. The government appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fullam, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership