From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
United States v. Dinges
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
55 M.J. 308 (2001)
Colonel M was the wing commander at Tinker Air Force Base. As part of his community-relations efforts, M accepted an offer to be a district chairman for the Boy Scouts. In this position, M’s only duties were to attend meetings every few months. However, as a result of M’s connection to the Boy Scouts, M received information that Air Force Captain Warren Dinges (defendant), a scoutmaster, had allegedly been involved in a consensual, sexual relationship with a scout over the age of 16. Civilian authorities were not interested in the information. However, because of his rank, M was a special court-martial convening authority. In this role, M initiated an investigation into the allegations against Dinges and determined that there was sufficient information to warrant an Article 32 investigation. M helped Dinges to find a position at Tinker while the investigation went forward. Based on the results of the Article 32 investigation, M recommended that the matter be referred to a general court-martial. A general court-martial was convened, and Dinges was sentenced. Dinges appealed, arguing that M was not allowed to be a convening authority in the prosecution because M’s connection to the Boy Scouts gave M a personal interest in the prosecution. The appellate court held a DuBay hearing to gather evidence regarding M’s interest in the prosecution and then reviewed the appeal.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Crawford, C.J.)
Dissent (Effron, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.