United States v. DiPaolo

804 F.2d 225 (1986)

From our private database of 45,900+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. DiPaolo

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
804 F.2d 225 (1986)

Facts

Nick DiPaolo, Edward Weather, and Paul Snyder (defendants) were convicted of crimes relating to a Postal Service robbery and intimidation and use of physical force against Lucille Barone and Joanne Barone. During their cross-examination of Joanne Barone, the defendants sought to cross-examine Joanne Barone about her drinking problem. The trial court held an in-camera hearing in which Joanne testified that, although she did have a drinking problem at points during her life, she was not drinking at the time she was assaulted and had been sober for at least a few weeks. Based on the in-camera hearing, the trial court did not permit the defendants to cross-examine Joanne about her drinking problem. Following their conviction, DiPaolo, Weather, and Snyder appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Oakes, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 741,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 741,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 45,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership