United States v. Escobar de Bright

742 F.2d 1196 (1984)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Escobar de Bright

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
742 F.2d 1196 (1984)

Facts

Manny Banda was a paid informant for the Drug Enforcement Administration who was in contact with Ernesto Ayala-Zarate about the planned importation and distribution of heroin from Mexico. Ayala-Zarate gave Banda the phone number for his brother’s mother-in-law, Hilda Escobar de Bright (defendant), so that Banda could solicit her help in importing the heroin. Banda called Escobar de Bright and persuaded her to drive immediately to Mexico. After Escobar de Bright drove into Mexico and came back across the border, her teenage son Francisco got into her car. The car was later stopped by customs-patrol officers who discovered that Francisco was carrying four ounces of heroin. Escobar de Bright was indicted on conspiracy, importing, possession, and intent-to-distribute drug charges. Escobar de Bright claimed at trial that she only drove into Mexico because she was afraid of Banda and had not discussed the scheme with anyone besides him. Escobar de Bright was convicted on all counts and appealed the conspiracy convictions, alleging that the court should have instructed the jury that she could not be guilty of conspiracy if she only conspired with a government agent.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Reinhardt, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership