From our private database of 30,500+ case briefs...
United States v. Espinoza
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
641 F.2d 153 (4th Cir. 1981)
Joseph Espinoza (defendant) was charged with transporting child pornography. The prosecution called Clifford Holdren as a witness. Holdren testified, over Espinoza’s objection, that he would receive child pornography by calling a phone number and asking for “Joe.” A man identifying himself as Joe would answer, and Holdren would order the pornography from Joe. Holdren stated that he had never met Joe and did not know what Joe looked like. The prosecution also presented evidence that Espinoza’s fingerprint was found on an invoice to Holdren for child pornography. Espinoza was convicted. Espinoza appealed, arguing that Holdren should not have been permitted to testify about the telephone conversations.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Staker, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 550,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 550,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 30,500 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.