United States v. Fallon
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
776 F.2d 727 (1985)
Fallon (defendant) was convicted of federal crimes related to the alteration of odometer readings on used cars. Huebner was charged as a co-conspirator. Huebner entered into an agreement with the prosecution under which the government agreed to pursue limited charges and recommend no prison sentence as long as Huebner satisfactorily cooperated in the prosecution of Fallon. During trial, Fallon moved to strike Huebner’s testimony. The district court granted the motion and instructed the jury to disregard Huebner’s testimony. The United States (plaintiff) appealed the trial court’s decision to strike Huebner’s testimony.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Bauer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.