United States v. Frank
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
11 F.Supp.2d 341 (S.D.N.Y. 1998)
Deric Frank (defendant), an alleged drug dealer, was charged with the murder of his former girlfriend, Shaneika Price. The prosecution’s case theory was that Frank killed Price because he thought she was cooperating with police about his drug dealing. Additionally, the prosecution believed that the murder was the culmination of a long history of Frank domestically abusing Price. In furthering these theories, the prosecution sought to introduce evidence of Frank’s drug dealing and of his past abuse of Price. Frank objected to the admission of this evidence.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cote, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 166,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.