United States v. Frezzo Brothers, Inc.

602 F.2d 1123 (1979)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Frezzo Brothers, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
602 F.2d 1123 (1979)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Frezzo Brothers, Inc., which was operated by Guido and James Frezzo (collectively Frezzo) (defendants), was a mushroom-farming business. Frezzo produced compost as a mushroom-growing base. Frezzo’s farm had a concrete holding tank to contain water runoff from the compost and to recycle water back to it. The farm’s separate storm-water runoff system carried rainwater to a channel box that was connected to a tributary that flowed into a creek. High concentrations of pollutants were found in the channel box that flowed into the tributary. Frezzo was convicted of violating § 1311(a) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (FWPCA). On appeal, Frezzo argued that the indictment should have been dismissed because the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) had not promulgated any effluent limitations applicable to compost manufacturing that Frezzo could have violated.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rosenn, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership