United States v. Friedlaunder & Co. Inc.
United States Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
27 C.C.P.A. 297 (1940)
- Written by Gonzalo Rodriguez, JD
Facts
Friedlaunder & Company, Inc. (Friedlaunder) (plaintiff) imported into the United States chinaware manufactured in Czechoslovakia, which was under the control of Germany by the time the products were shipped. The Customs Administrative Act of 1938 required that every imported product be marked to indicate its country of origin. The collector of customs of the Port of New York (customs) (defendant) refused to release the chinaware because the products were not marked as originating from Germany. Friedlaunder challenged customs’ decision, arguing that the chinaware was manufactured before Czechoslovakia came under German control. The United States Customs Court agreed with Friedlaunder, and customs appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Jackson, J.)
Dissent (Bland, J.)
Dissent (Garrett, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.