United States v. Garcia
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
413 F.3d 201 (2005)

- Written by Kate Luck, JD
Facts
Yuri Garcia (defendant) was charged with conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Paul Klemick, a narcotics agent, testified at Garcia’s trial. Klemick testified regarding the techniques used to investigate the drug conspiracy, such as wiretaps, surveillance, interviews of informants, and review of law-enforcement databases. Klemick was asked by the prosecution whether, in the course of his investigation, Klemick was able to determine Garcia’s role in the conspiracy. The court rephrased the question to ask Klemick, “As far as you could determine, what did [Garcia] do?” Klemick testified that, based on the agency’s investigation, Garcia was a partner with another drug conspirator in receiving cocaine and helped test the quality of the cocaine. The jury found Garcia guilty. Garcia appealed, arguing that the district court erred in admitting Klemick’s testimony as lay-witness opinion testimony.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Raggi, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.