Quimbee logo
DMCA.com Protection Status
  • U
  • United States v. GholstonUnited States v. Gholston
From our private database of 16,800+ case briefs...

United States v. Gholston

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
932 F.2d 904 (1991)


Facts

The federal government (plaintiff) prosecuted Ben Gholston (defendant) for assaulting a federal official with a dangerous weapon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 111. The trial evidence established that Gholston overturned a desk onto a receptionist at a Social Security Administration office, and then hit her in the neck with his hand. The judge denied Gholston's motion for judgment of acquittal, and the jury returned a guilty verdict. On appeal to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, Gholston contended that a desk is not a dangerous weapon within the meaning of § 111.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 449,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 449,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 16,800 briefs, keyed to 224 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Questions & Answers


Have a question about this case?

Sign up for a free 7-day trial and ask it

Sign up for a FREE 7-day trial