United States v. Girard

601 F.2d 69 (2d Cir. 1979)

From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Girard

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
601 F.2d 69 (2d Cir. 1979)

Facts

Girard (defendant), a former Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) agent and James Bond discussed a plan to smuggle marijuana into the United States from Mexico. Girard told Bond that he could, for $500 per name, obtain information from an inside source about whether others involved in the scheme were government informants. The inside source was a current DEA agent named Lambert. Thereafter, Bond became a DEA informant and disclosed his conversations with Girard to the DEA. Under the surveillance of the DEA, Bond asked Girard to secure reports on four men. DEA records were kept in computerized files. As a result, the DEA was able to determine that Girard’s source of the reports was Lambert. Girard and Lambert were convicted of the unauthorized sale of government property in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 641 and conspiring to accomplish the sale in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 71. Girard and Lambert appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (van Graafeiland, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 782,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 782,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership