United States v. Haddock
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
956 F.2d 1534 (1992)
- Written by Nathan Benedict, JD
Facts
Kenneth Haddock (defendant) was charged with various bank-fraud related offenses. At trial, he sought to introduce photocopies of six documents. The trial court excluded the documents, finding that they lacked reliability. No witness other than Haddock was familiar with the contents of the documents. In some cases, a party who had allegedly created or received the original documents could not attest to their genuineness. Several witnesses testified that the documents contained markings and statements inconsistent with those typically prepared by the named banks. Haddock was convicted and appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Tacha, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 926,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,003 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

