United States v. Hastings
United States Supreme Court
461 U.S. 499 (1983)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Hastings, et al. (defendants) were charged with kidnapping and transporting women across state lines for immoral purposes. Each of the defendants invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. During the trial, the prosecutor commented on the defendants’ decisions to invoke this right. The district court convicted the defendants. The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit (Seventh Circuit) reversed, finding that the prosecutor’s comment violated the defendants’ Fifth Amendment rights. The Seventh Circuit explicitly chose not to apply the harmless error doctrine. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Burger, C.J.)
Concurrence/Dissent (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.