From our private database of 35,400+ case briefs...
United States v. Haymond
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
672 F.3d 948 (2012)
Andre Haymond (plaintiff), an 18-year-old Oklahoma resident, used his computer to locate, host, download, and share images of child pornography. Rich Whisman, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), discovered Haymond’s illegal activities during an undercover online investigation into child-pornography activity on LimeWire, a peer-to-peer file sharing website. A peer-to-peer website allows users to share files with other users directly from their own computers without the need for a central server. Agent Whisman found Haymond’s shared files on LimeWire, downloaded a selection to confirm the files contained child pornography, and then obtained a warrant to search Haymond’s computer. Haymond consented to an interview with FBI agents and admitted to searching for and downloading child pornography on a regular basis. During the FBI’s forensic evaluation of Haymond’s computer, the FBI found 70 files containing child pornography, seven of which were confirmed to be part of a series produced in Florida. The source of the other photos could not be confirmed. The images were recovered from the unallocated space on Haymond’s computer, meaning that Haymond had deleted the files before the computer was seized. The FBI recovered the deleted files using special software. The federal government (defendant) charged Haymond with possession of child pornography for the seven Florida child-pornography images. Haymond was convicted following a jury trial. Haymond appealed, arguing there was insufficient evidence to prove that (1) Haymond knew the image files discovered on his computer were child pornography; or that (2) Haymond had control over the child-pornography files found in the unallocated disk space on his computer.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Seymour, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 617,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 617,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,400 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.