United States v. Hernandez

864 F.3d 1292 (2017)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Hernandez

United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
864 F.3d 1292 (2017)

Facts

Four individuals (the crewmen) (defendants) on a ship called the Cristiano Ronaldo dumped black packages into the water. The United States Coast Guard retrieved some of the packages and discovered that the packages contained cocaine. The crewmen were indicted on drug-related charges. At the trial, the crewmen argued that another ship, the Clara Luz, was the source of the cocaine found in the water. In order to rebut this claim, the government (plaintiff) offered testimony from Officer Arambula, an officer in the Coast Guard. Officer Arambula testified about the out-of-court conduct of his colleague, Officer Ligsay. Specifically, Officer Arambula testified that he saw Officer Ligsay inspect the fish hold of the Clara Luz and that Officer Ligsay did not appear concerned during and after the inspection. There was no indication that Officer Ligsay intended his conduct to communicate any message to Officer Arambula. The district-court judge admitted Officer Ligsay’s nonverbal conduct into evidence. Subsequently, the jury convicted the crewmen. The crewmen appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rogers, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership