Logourl black
From our private database of 14,200+ case briefs...

United States v. Hodge

United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
412 F.3d 479 (2005)


Facts

The United States (plaintiff) indicted Devin Hodge (defendant) and his brother, Irvine Hodge, for the murder of a store owner. The prosecution offered Devin and Irvine identical plea agreements. The agreements were each contingent on both agreements being accepted. The brothers accepted the plea agreements and pleaded guilty. The district court sentenced each of the brothers to life in prison. Devin appealed, arguing that the plea colloquy was improper because the district court was not aware that Devin’s plea was contingent on Irvine’s plea, and vice versa.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Smith, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 252,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,200 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.