United States v. Hoffner
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
777 F.2d 1423 (1985)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Dr. Mary Hoffner (defendant) was charged with illegally prescribing drugs. At trial, Hoffner sought to introduce the testimony of three lay witnesses. Hoffner’s counsel asked the lay witnesses their opinion on whether Hoffner intended to write the prescriptions for a legitimate medical purpose. The witnesses were not present in the room when Hoffner examined the patients and wrote the prescriptions at issue. The witnesses also did not overhear any discussions between Hoffner and the patients. Upon the objection of the prosecution (plaintiff), the district court excluded the testimony of the witnesses. Hoffner was convicted, and she appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Barrett, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.