United States v. Johnson
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
575 F.2d 1347 (1978)
The six defendants (defendants) in this case were charged with dealing in marijuana. One of the issues was whether the marijuana had been imported from outside the United States, namely Colombia. The prosecution called John de Pianelli to testify as an expert witness that the marijuana dealt by defendants came from Colombia. De Pianelli allegedly helped the defendants’ smuggling ring by unloading it and smoking some of the marijuana each time to make sure it was Colombian. De Pianelli said he had smoked marijuana over 1,000 times and that he had been asked to identify marijuana over 100 times and had never made a mistake. He based his identification on the marijuana’s appearance, smell and the effect of smoking it. The defendants objected to de Pianelli as an expert witness. The district court permitted de Pianelli’s testimony and the defendants were convicted. The defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Clark, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 725,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 725,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.