United States v. Jones
United States Supreme Court
565 U.S. 400, 132 S. Ct. 945, 181 L. Ed. 2d 911 (2012)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
Washington, DC, nightclub owner Antoine Jones (defendant) was suspected by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) of being involved in a large-scale drug-trafficking operation. As part of a joint task-force operation with the police, FBI agents applied for a warrant that would allow them to place a GPS tracking device on Jones’s vehicle in an effort to track his movements. A federal district court issued the warrant but required the agents to place the device on Jones’s vehicle within 10 days of issuance of the warrant and while the vehicle was physically located in the District of Columbia. On the eleventh day, and while the vehicle was parked in a lot in Maryland, agents placed the GPS device on the vehicle’s undercarriage. For 28 days, the government used the device to track Jones’s movements, collecting more than 2,000 pages of data. Jones was indicted on multiple counts of drug-related offenses. Prior to trial, defense counsel filed a motion to suppress the information the government obtained from the GPS device. The district court granted the motion in part and suppressed only the data obtained while the vehicle was parked in a garage adjoining Jones’s residence. Jones was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment. The court of appeals reversed and held the warrantless use of the GPS device violated the Fourth Amendment. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari to review.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)
Concurrence (Alito, J.)
Concurrence (Sotomayor, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.