From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
United States v. Kendrick
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
331 F.2d 110 (1964)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Kendrick (defendant) was convicted and filed a motion to vacate his sentence based on the grounds that he was incompetent to stand trial. At the hearing on this motion, Kendrick’s trial attorney testified that throughout the trial, Kendrick was responsive, logical, and appeared to comprehend the nature of the trial. The trial court denied Kendrick’s motion. He appealed on the grounds that the trial attorney’s testimony should have been excluded under the attorney-client privilege.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Per Curiam)
What to do next…
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
