United States v. LaFleur
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
971 F.2d 200 (1991)
Larry LaFleur and Nick Holm (defendants) approached 82-year-old Otto Bloomquist in a shopping mall parking lot and forced Bloomquist into his own car. LaFleur drove the vehicle to a remote area where he and Holm shot and killed Bloomquist. After defendants were apprehended by the police, each defendant alleged he shot Bloomquist under duress from the other. Defendants were indicted in federal district court for murder and kidnapping, among other crimes. Holm pled guilty to premeditated murder and two other counts were dropped. The district court rejected LaFleur’s request to instruct the jury on duress as a defense to murder. LaFleur appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Wiggins, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.