United States v. Lara
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
181 F.3d 183 (1999)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The United States (plaintiff) prosecuted Giovanni Lara and his fellow gang members (defendants) for racketeering and related crimes. On direct examination, defendant George Perry was only asked about one of those crimes, carjacking. On cross examination, the prosecutor questioned Perry about other gang crimes. Perry appealed his conviction to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, on the grounds that the cross examination was impermissibly broad in violation of Federal Rule of Evidence 611(b).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Selya, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 780,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.