United States Supreme Court
340 U.S. 590 (1951)
In 1944, Lewis (plaintiff) received $22,000 as a bonus from his employer, which he reported as income for that year. A state court determined in 1946 that the amount of the bonus had been wrongly calculated and that Lewis was only entitled to an $11,000 bonus in 1944. Lewis therefore returned the excess amount to his employer. Until 1946, Lewis used the entire $22,000 unconditionally as his own. After returning the excess, Lewis filed suit in the Court of Claims to receive a refund of taxes paid on the excess. The Court of Claims ruled that the excess received under a mistake of fact was not income to Lewis and that Lewis was entitled to a refund.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Black, J.)
Dissent (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.