United States v. Long

857 F.2d 436 (1988)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...

United States v. Long

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

857 F.2d 436 (1988)

Facts

The government (plaintiff) charged Thaddeus Long and Edward Jackson (defendants) with check-forging and bank fraud. Attorney Paul Engh represented Jackson. During trial, Engh said Jackson wanted to testify but had concerns about it and that Engh had advised Jackson not to testify. After the judge cleared the courtroom, Engh said, “I’m not sure if it wouldn’t be appropriate for me to move for a withdrawal from this case based upon what I think may be elicited on the stand.” The judge said Jackson had a right to testify and that Engh was bound by his professional obligation not to present evidence he believed untrue, both of which Jackson said he understood. The judge explained Jackson could take the stand and give a narrative without Engh questioning him, but if Engh “found things which he believes to be not true . . . he may have other obligations at that point.” Jackson again said he understood his rights and Engh’s obligations but chose not to testify. Jackson and Long were convicted and appealed on multiple grounds, including that Engh provided ineffective assistance of counsel by abandoning his role as Jackson’s advocate and keeping him from testifying.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Heaney, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 36,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership