United States v. Lopez
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
4 F.4th 706 (2021)
- Written by Nathan Benedict, JD
Facts
Wilfredo Lopez (defendant) was charged with various offenses stemming from online communications with an undercover agent posing as a 13-year-old girl. When Lopez was arrested, he engaged in an 80-minute interview with law-enforcement officers in which he admitted to the communications. However, Lopez also made statements indicating that he knew that the person with whom he was communicating was a law-enforcement officer and that he continued the communications because he sought to be discharged from the military. At trial, the government introduced 10 clips from Lopez’s interview. Lopez objected, arguing that Federal Rule of Evidence 106 required either that the clips be excluded or that the entire interview be introduced. The trial court admitted the clips over Lopez’s objection. Lopez was convicted and appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bea, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 926,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,003 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

