United States v. Loretta Otero

563 F.3d 1127 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Loretta Otero

United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
563 F.3d 1127 (2009)

  • Written by Sharon Feldman, JD

Facts

Residents along the delivery route of postal carrier Loretta Otero (defendant) complained that credit cards, bills, and personal-identification numbers were not being delivered and cash had been withdrawn from their accounts. A postal inspector mailed test letters, determined that the letters were not delivered, and found them in Otero’s bag. The inspector prepared a search warrant for Otero’s residence authorizing the seizure of two categories of evidence: “items to be seized” and “computer items to be seized.” The items listed under the first heading related to residents on Otero’s route and theft of mail, credit-card fraud, and bank fraud. No similar limitations were specified under the computer heading, under which was listed any and all information stored in computers, electronic devices, programs, and other computer-related materials. Otero was indicted and moved to suppress documents found on her computer on the grounds that the warrant lacked sufficient particularity. The searching officers testified that they read the items listed under the computer heading as limited by the first half of the warrant. The district court granted Otero’s motion to suppress. The government (plaintiff) appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (McConnell, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership