United States v. Loud Hawk

474 U.S. 302 (1986)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Loud Hawk

United States Supreme Court
474 U.S. 302 (1986)

  • Written by Arlyn Katen, JD

Facts

In 1975, a federal grand jury indicted Kenneth Loud Hawk and several other people (defendants) with charges related to their possession of dynamite and firearms. The district court granted the defendants’ motion to suppress evidence related to the dynamite charges and ultimately dismissed the indictment. The government (plaintiff) appealed the district court’s suppression of the dynamite evidence and dismissal of the indictment. During nearly four years of appeals, the defendants were unconditionally released from incarceration or supervision. Ultimately, in 1980, the government reindicted the defendants. The defendants’ interlocutory appeals to dismiss those indictments were finally denied in January 1983. Trial was set for April 1983, but after one prosecution and two court continuances, the district court again dismissed the indictment in May 1983, finding that the defendants’ speedy-trial rights had been violated. A divided circuit court affirmed the district court but noted that the defendants experienced little actual prejudice from the trial delays. The United States Supreme Court granted certiorari.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Powell, J.)

Dissent (Marshall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership