United States v. Love

20 F.4th 407 (2021)

From our private database of 47,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Love

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
20 F.4th 407 (2021)

Facts

Earl Love (defendant) was an inmate at the U.S. Medical Center for Federal Prisoners (center), a federal correctional facility located in Springfield, Missouri. He attacked another inmate, causing serious injuries. Love was charged with assault under 18 U.S.C. § 113(a)(6), a federal statute criminalizing assaults within the United States’ special maritime and territorial jurisdiction. For a conviction, the government needed to prove that (1) Love intentionally assaulted another, (2) the other person suffered a serious bodily injury, and (3) the assault occurred within the special maritime and territorial jurisdiction of the United States. The district court resolved the third element by judicial notice, conclusively instructing the jury that the center fell within the United States’ special maritime and territorial jurisdiction, meaning that if the jury concluded the assault occurred at the center, then the third element of the offense was satisfied. Love was convicted. He appealed to the Eighth Circuit, arguing that the judge’s instruction deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Benton, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 911,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 911,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,100 briefs, keyed to 997 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 911,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,100 briefs - keyed to 997 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership