United States v. Marion
United States Supreme Court
404 U.S. 307 (1971)
- Written by DeAnna Swearingen, LLM
Facts
Marion and others (defendants) were indicted for crimes that occurred more than three years before. The United States Attorney’s office said the delay was due to understaffing and more important cases taking precedence. The defendants claimed that the lengthy delay before indictment was unduly prejudicial and sought dismissal under the Sixth Amendment.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (White, J.)
Concurrence (Douglas, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.