United States v. McKenna
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana
791 F. Supp. 1101 (1992)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
At trial, the district court prohibited the lawyer for McKenna (defendant) from using leading questions to cross-examine Bruno, a witness for the government (plaintiff). Given this prohibition, McKenna’s lawyer decided not to cross-examine Bruno at all. McKenna was convicted and filed a motion for a new trial, arguing that his right to confront adverse witnesses was violated by the court’s prohibition on leading questions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Schwartz Jr., J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.