From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
United States v. McMillon
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
14 F.3d 948 (1994)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Julia McMillon (defendant) was charged with conspiracy in relation to a crack-cocaine-distribution ring. At trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) called Jacques Beckwith to testify against McMillon, identifying McMillon as the leader of the ring. On cross, the defense counsel attempted to obtain testimony that Beckwith manipulated addicts into exchanging sexual favors for access to drugs. The court sustained the prosecution’s objection to this line of questioning, and McMillon was convicted. On appeal, McMillon argued that Beckwith’s manipulation for sexual favors was probative of his truthfulness, and thus, should have been admitted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Ervin, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
