United States v. Meises
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
645 F.3d 5 (2011)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Juan Meises and Jose Reyes-Guerrero (defendants) were charged with a drug-related conspiracy. At trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) called Officer Cruz as a witness. Cruz was the lead investigator on the case and thus heavily involved in the investigation. Cruz testified to many things that he had personally seen or heard during the investigation, including while listening to pertinent phone calls and watching certain videotaped meetings between coconspirators and undercover officers. Cruz had not, however, witnessed firsthand a key interaction between a coconspirator and an undercover officer in a van. Cruz also testified as to the roles Meises and Reyes-Guerrero had played in the conspiracy, labeling them as brokers or buyers. Meises and Reyes-Guerrero were convicted, and they appealed on the ground that Cruz’s testimony about their roles in the conspiracy should not have been permitted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lipez, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.