United States v. Mills
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
138 F.3d 928 (1998)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Margie Mills (defendant) was charged along with her husband with false statements and Medicare fraud, among other things. Specifically, the prosecution alleged that Mills falsely filled out Medicare forms. At trial, the prosecution sought to introduce, over Mills’s objection, evidence that Mills had previously hidden from customs agents an overseas jewelry purchase that was subject to duty. The prosecution argued that the customs falsification showed Mills’s “willingness to engage in intentional deception of government agents . . . for personal financial gain.” The district court admitted the evidence and convicted Mills. Mills appealed on the grounds that the evidence should not have been admitted.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Cox, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
