United States v. Moncini

882 F.2d 401 (1989)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Moncini

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
882 F.2d 401 (1989)

Facts

Alessandro Moncini (defendant) was an Italian citizen who mailed child-pornography materials from Italy to an undercover officer in the United States. United States law prohibited knowingly mailing child pornography for any reason. Moncini was arrested and tried in a United States federal court for the child-pornography violation. At trial, Moncini claimed that he did not know that his actions were illegal in the United States. Moncini presented evidence that Italy had some restrictions on mailing child pornography, but that Moncini’s act of mailing child pornography to another private individual for private use was legal in Italy. Moncini argued that his lack of knowledge about the act’s illegality meant that he (1) lacked the mens rea needed to be guilty of a crime and (2) had no notice that the law was different in the United States and, therefore, had been denied due process. Moncini was convicted and sentenced to one year and one day in prison. Moncini appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership