United States v. Morgan
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
581 F.2d 933 (1978)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Detective Mathis, a police officer, was told by an informant that an individual named Timmy was selling drugs out of Timmy’s mother’s house where Timmy lived. Mathis filed an affidavit with this information to get a search warrant, stating that he learned the information from a reliable informant. With the warrant, the police raided Timmy’s mother’s house and allegedly found Morgan (defendant) inside in possession of drugs. At trial, Morgan denied possessing the drugs. Morgan sought to introduce the statements of the informant that indicated that Timmy lived in the house and sold drugs out of it. These statements were contained in Mathis’s affidavit. The trial court ruled the statements inadmissible as hearsay. Morgan was convicted of possession of drugs with intent to distribute. He appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bazelon, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
