United States v. Neapolitan

791 F.2d 489 (1986)

From our private database of 46,100+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Neapolitan

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
791 F.2d 489 (1986)

SC

Facts

Robert Cadieux and Ronald Sapit were corrupt police officers and ran a chop shop, while obtaining bribes in exchange for police protection. Cadieux and Sapit told an informant that Robert Neapolitan (defendant) was also involved in the corruption. In addition, Neapolitan received one bribe at the chop shop and made recorded statements that would indicate that he was working with Cadieux and Sapit and had agreed to the operation of the racketeering ring. Cadieux was actually present when Neapolitan received the bribe. In all, the evidence at trial showed that Neapolitan’s involvement in the corrupt police enterprise was limited, but that he did solicit the one cash bribe at the chop shop and he did agree that a pattern of crime continue to occur at the chop shop. Neapolitan was convicted of a conspiracy to violate the RICO Act. Neapolitan appealed on the grounds that he only committed one act of racketeering activity, but the RICO Act requires two or more acts for it to be violated.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Flaum, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 745,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,100 briefs, keyed to 987 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 745,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,100 briefs - keyed to 987 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership