United States v. Olson

450 F.3d 655 (2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Olson

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
450 F.3d 655 (2006)

Facts

Pedro Martinez (defendant) was tried and convicted in federal court for racketeering and murder. During the investigation, Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Agent Daniel Craft brought Martinez into the United States attorney’s office for questioning. While waiting for Martinez’s counsel to arrive for questioning, Craft made a remark that if Martinez cooperated, he could get a 10-year plea deal from the assistant United States attorney prosecuting the case. A couple of days later, Martinez returned for a meeting with Craft, as well as Assistant United States Attorneys Larsen and Moreno-Taxman. During the meeting, Martinez was confronted by Moreno-Taxman with evidence linking him to multiple murders. In response, Martinez corrected certain parts of Moreno-Taxman’s account, which implicated Martinez in the murders. At trial, Martinez filed a motion to suppress the statements that he made during the meeting. The district court denied the motion and the statements were admitted. Martinez was convicted. On appeal, Martinez argued that he made those statements based on the reasonable belief that he was engaging in plea discussions due to remarks made by Agent Craft.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rovner, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership