United States v. Payne
United States Court of Military Appeals
3 M.J. 354 (1977)
- Written by Salina Kennedy, JD
Facts
Major Payne was appointed to serve as Article 32 investigating officer concerning charges against Specialist Leslie J. Payne (defendant). Despite being informed that the office of the staff judge advocate was available to advise Major Payne on his role, Major Payne chose to seek information and advice by engaging in multiple ex parte conversations with the prosecutor in the matter. The topics of these conversations included the burden of proof, evidentiary standards, and the legality of a search that had produced evidence against Specialist Payne. Major Payne characterized these conversations as procedural in nature. Specialist Payne was ultimately convicted of failure to safeguard classified material, wrongful appropriation of government documents, and furnishing classified materials to an unauthorized person. The United States Army Court of Military Review approved the conviction. Specialist Payne appealed, arguing that his pretrial rights had been violated because Major Payne had not been impartial.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Fletcher, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.