United States v. Pheaster
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
544 F.2d 353, cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1099, 97 S.Ct. 1118, 51 L.Ed.2d 546 (1977)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Larry Adell, a multi-millionaire's 16-year-old son, was kidnapped for ransom and was never seen again. Angelo Inciso and Hugh Pheaster (defendants) were charged with 12 criminal counts related to the kidnapping. At trial, the prosecution (plaintiff) sought to introduce into evidence statements made by Adell to two friends the night of the incident, in which Adell said that he was going to meet a man named Angelo in a parking lot to pick up some marijuana. One of the friends also testified that she had been with Adell another time when he met with a man named Angelo, and she identified Inciso as that man. The district court admitted Adell’s statements to his friends. After a jury convicted Inciso and Pheaster on all counts, they appealed. Among the issues raised on appeal, Inciso argued that the district court erred in admitting the hearsay testimony of Adell's friends about Adell's statements.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Renfrew, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.