United States v. Philadelphia National Bank
United States Supreme Court
374 U.S. 321 (1963)
The Philadelphia National Bank (PNB) (defendant) and Girard Trust Corn Exchange Bank (Girard) were the second-largest and third-largest commercial banks in the Philadelphia metropolitan area. PNB and Girard planned to merge their operations, which would establish the post-merger PNB-Girard bank as the largest commercial bank in the area, with a market share of over 30 percent. The United States (plaintiff) brought a complaint against PNB and Girard, alleging that the prospective merger violated § 7 of the Clayton Act, because the merger would tend to substantially reduce competition. The government supported its claim with evidence that commercial banking in the Philadelphia area had been increasing in concentration for years and that the PNB-Girard merger would further that concentration by more than 33 percent, thus significantly reducing competition. PNB argued that the pro-competitive benefits justified the merger and that the proper geographic market should be expanded to include large New York banks. The district court held in favor of PNB, and the government appealed the decision.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Brennan, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.