United States v. Proano
United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
912 F.3d 431 (2019)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Proano (defendant) was a police officer and was charged with civil-rights violations for his handling of an arrestee. The prosecution (plaintiff) called Snelling and Jamison as witnesses. Snelling and Jamison were police academy teachers at the time Proano was enrolled in the academy and testified to having given use-of-force training at the academy. The witnesses could not remember whether they had trained Proano specifically but testified that there was a common curriculum at the academy that maintained consistency across instructors. Proano was convicted. Proano appealed, arguing that Snelling and Jamison’s testimony should not have been admitted because the witnesses did not have personal knowledge of the training Proano received.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (St. Eve, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.