United States v. Ressam
United States Supreme Court
553 U.S. 272 (2008)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
When attempting to enter the United States, Ahmed Ressam (defendant) provided false information on his customs-declaration form. A customs official searched Ressam’s car and found explosives that Ressam intended to detonate in the United States. Ressam was charged with and convicted of making a false statement to a customs official in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001 and carrying an explosive “during the commission of any felony which may be prosecuted in a court of the United States” in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 844(h)(2). The Ninth Circuit set aside Ressam’s § 844(h) conviction because it read the word “during” to require that the explosive be carried “in relation to” providing false information to the customs official. The Supreme Court granted the petition for certiorari filed by the government (plaintiff).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Stevens, J.)
Dissent (Breyer, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.