United States v. Robertson

37 M.J. 432 (1993)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Robertson

United States Court of Military Appeals
37 M.J. 432 (1993)

Facts

Robertson’s (defendant) son Brad visited Robertson in 1988 during Brad’s spring break from school. Brad was overweight but had become anorexic and bulimic once he realized that he could lose weight by vomiting and not eating. While with Robertson, Brad was brought to a doctor, who thought that he looked healthy but should return for a checkup within the month. Brad never returned for this checkup and continued to lose weight while in Robertson’s care. After a few months, Brad returned home to his mother, and was found dead in his sleep his first night home due to cardiac failure stemming from starvation. Robertson was charged with and convicted of involuntary manslaughter for his role in Brad’s death. Robertson appealed his conviction, claiming that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Wiss, J.)

Concurrence (Gierke, J.)

Dissent (Cox, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 743,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 743,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership