United States v. Rosado-Fernandez

614 F.2d 50 (1980)

From our private database of 46,000+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Rosado-Fernandez

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
614 F.2d 50 (1980)

Play video

Facts

John Lawler, an undercover Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) agent, went to Jose Eligio Borges (defendant) with the intent to purchase three kilos of cocaine. After the two discussed the price and delivery, Borges made a telephone call in Spanish and instructed Lawler to return later that evening. Thereafter, Lawler met Borges and his “supplier,” Oscar Rosado-Fernandez (defendant), at a restaurant. Lawler, Rosado and Borges discussed the purchase and delivery of the cocaine. No actual delivery took place that evening. The next day Lawler and Rosado had a series of recorded telephone conversations in which Rosado quoted Lawler a price of $46,000 per kilo. Subsequently, Lawler and Rosado met at the home Nelson Garcia (defendant). While there, Lawler was presented with the cocaine. As federal officers moved into to make arrests, a fourth co-defendant, Zayas, took the cocaine and dumped it into the swimming pool. Lawler dove into the pool and recovered samples of the water and cocaine. All of the defendants were charged with, and convicted of, conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Rosado was also convicted of using a communications facility during the commission of a felony in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, and 843(b). Borges and Rosado appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Ainsworth, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 742,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,000 briefs, keyed to 986 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 742,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,000 briefs - keyed to 986 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership