United States v. Rosario-Diaz
United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
202 F.3d 54 (2000)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Ralph Rosario-Diaz and other individuals (defendants) were charged with a carjacking that resulted in the death of a victim. Gregorio Aponte-Lazu, a co-conspirator in the carjacking, pled guilty and agreed to testify on behalf of the prosecution. After Aponte-Lazu testified, the prosecution called FBI agent Daryl Huff as a witness. Huff testified, over the defendants’ objection, about his interactions with Aponte-Lazu during the investigation. Specifically, Huff testified about how the investigators had determined whether Aponte-Lazu was telling the truth, and about certain occasions on which the investigators knew that Aponte-Lazu was lying. Aponte-Lazu’s credibility had not been attacked. The district court instructed the jury to determine Aponte-Lazu’s credibility based only on Aponte-Lazu’s testimony, and not on Huff’s testimony. The defendants were convicted, and they appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Torruella, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.