United States v. Sasso

59 F.3d 341 (1995)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Sasso

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
59 F.3d 341 (1995)

Facts

Robert Sasso and Anthony Armienti (defendants) were charged with various crimes relating to the illegal possession of firearms. At trial, Armienti’s former girlfriend, Kristine Kramer, testified for the government (plaintiff). At a motion in limine hearing, defense counsel revealed that it sought approval to question Kramer about seeing a psychiatrist and taking prescribed mood stabilizers. Kramer had previously been involved in an unrelated car accident in which the other driver was fatally injured. Subsequently, Kramer saw a psychiatrist for her resulting depression and was prescribed mood stabilizers. The trial court barred all mention of Kramer’s psychiatric history, ruling that it was not relevant to the case. Sasso and Armienti were convicted at trial. On appeal, Sasso and Armienti argued that not being allowed to pursue this line of questioning violated their Sixth Amendment rights to confront an adverse witness.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Kearse, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership