United States v. Shayota
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
934 F.3d 1049 (2019)
- Written by Nathan Benedict, JD
Facts
Adriana Shayota (defendant) was convicted of conspiracy. At trial, the court admitted deposition testimony from two witnesses who had invoked their Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. The court found that the witnesses were unavailable, permitting introduction of their prior testimony. Shayota appealed the conviction.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (O’Scannlain, J.)
Concurrence (O’Scannlain, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 926,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,003 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.




