Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
U

United States v. Slocum

486 F. Supp. 2d 1104 (2007)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

United States v. Slocum

United States District Court for the Central District of California
486 F. Supp. 2d 1104 (2007)

  • Written by Heather Whittemore, JD

Facts

Wayne Bridgewater and Henry Michael Houston (defendants), federal prisoners who were members of the Aryan Brotherhood, were charged with murder under Pennsylvania and federal law after stabbing to death two fellow inmates who were members of a rival gang, the D.C. Blacks. The killings allegedly occurred during a gang war between the Aryan Brotherhood and the D.C. Blacks. Evidence showed that the victims were unarmed and in nonaggressive stances at the time they were stabbed. There was also no evidence that the victims had ever attacked or threatened Bridgewater or Houston. At trial, Bridgewater and Houston requested that the jury be instructed on self-defense, arguing that they had acted in self-defense when they had stabbed their victims.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Carter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Criminal Law

Key Terms